Showing posts with label LADC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label LADC. Show all posts

NH House panel backs bill further punishing DWI arrestees


I recently found this article by Ted Siefer, the Union Leader's State House Bureau correspondent:
CONCORD – Repeat drunk drivers could be required to use an ignition interlock device when their driving privileges are restored under a bill backed unanimously by a House committee.

The House Transportation Committee voted 10-0 Tuesday to endorse Senate Bill 282, which was passed by the Senate in February.

The bill would allow the Commissioner of Safety to request an administrative hearing before returning the driver’s license or driving privileges to anyone who was convicted for drunk driving, aggravated drunk driving, reckless driving that involved alcohol, negligent homicide that resulted from drunken driving, or being a habitual drunk driver.

Under the bill, offenders could be required to use either a standard interlock or “enhanced” device, which takes a photo when users breathe into it, for a period of one to two years.

The bill is one of several being pushed by the Department of Safety this session in an effort to crack down on repeat drunk driving. Last month the Senate passed a House-passed bill, HB 482, which would require anyone who tries to circumvent an interlock device to use the enhanced device and face other penalties.

A full House vote on SB 282 has not yet been scheduled.

 Here's the official version of the proposed bill:

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Twelve

AN ACT authorizing the commissioner of safety to require the installation of an ignition interlock device as a condition of restoring driving privileges in certain instances.

Be it Enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened:

1 New Section; Department of Safety Authority to Order Ignition Interlock Device Installation. Amend RSA 265-A by inserting after section 36 the following new section:
265-A:36-a Department of Safety Authority to Order Ignition Interlock Device Installation. The commissioner of safety may require an administrative hearing prior to the restoration of the license or driving privilege of a person whose license or driving privilege was revoked or suspended as the result of a conviction of any offense under RSA 265-A:45, RSA 265-A:2, RSA 265-A:3, RSA 265:79-a where alcohol was involved, RSA 262:19, or RSA 630:3, II, and, upon a finding that the safety of the person and of other users of the highways would be enhanced thereby, may order the person, as a condition of restoration of his or her license or driving privilege, to install an ignition interlock device in any vehicle registered to that person or used by that person, for not less than 12 months nor more than 2 years, subject to the same conditions and prohibitions as if the interlock was ordered by a court under the provisions of this subdivision.

2 Effective Date. This act shall take effect January 1, 2013.
(Note that this bill says nothing about "repeat offenders."  The Union Leader is the worst example of "journalism" I've ever encountered.  It's usually rife with factual, spelling, and typographical errors.)

I lost my driving privileges, due to a 1st Offense DUI in NH, for almost a year.  This was mainly due to the holy rollers at Amethyst Foundation punishing me for my "willfulness" (their actual words) in objecting to being forced to go to religious AA meetings.  During this period, I spent thousands on car rides to and from work (and mandated AA meetings). 

Bill 282 now provides additional hoops to jump through once you complete your aftercare:  an administrative hearing.  Administrative hearings, as I have posted before, are dangerous.  Unlike a criminal or civil court proceeding, administrative hearings do not afford the defendant much in the way of procedural protections.  Administrative hearings, in the name of judicial expediency and efficiency, often make quick, cursory, and subjective determinations.  See my previous post entitled:  "16 Red Flag Hearings: 14 Affirmed, 0 Reversed, 2 Remanded "


While restoring driving privileges on the condition that an ignition interlock device sounds reasonable (I would have gladly done this if it meant I could drive to work), it will likely open the door to further administrative requirements such as more aftercare being assigned, extra fees, and extended suspensions of driving privileges.  I see nothing in this bill that would restrain the administrative judges from doing this.

Further, ignition interlock devices (IIDs) are quite expensive.  In California the average cost for an IID is about $2.50 per day. Some companies additionally charge around $75-$100 for installation. You will also need to pay fees approaching $100 each month for the maintenance and calibration of your ignition interlock device.  Additionally, you will need to apply, and pay the fee, for a special IID license.  So, under NH Bill 282, the minimum one year IID could cost you around $1,300.

All this for a 1st Offense DUI, and after you complete your aftercare.  Again, my concern is that once forced into the administrative court hearing, you are relatively helpless to the whims of administrative judges, who, in the past, have not shown much leniency (or fairness, in my opinion).

A fairer version of this bill would allow the use of IIDs during the suspension period. Unless you live in Manchester or Concord, there is no public transportation.  Private rides cost $50-100, each.  Drivers on Craigslist are unreliable and sometimes dangerous.  Many people lose their jobs because they cannot afford this expense.  That's too harsh a penalty.

Not to the people at Amethyst Foundation, though, who will take glee in your suffering.  They are all former drunks who had to go through the same punishment, and will love to make you go through it, too.  Maybe, I'm sure they hope, you'll become a born-again Christian in the process, too.



Please Tell Me Your Experiences With Amethyst Foundation, Inc.

Send Me Your Stories About Amethyst Foundation, Inc.

I would love to hear about people's experiences with Amethyst Foundation, Inc.  I know there must be many, many stories about this fraudulent operation.

Yet, there is no information on the web about Amethyst Foundation, Inc., at all.  Please pass your stories, good and bad, on to me and I will post them anonymously.

People deserve to know what they are getting into when they are ordered to go there.

Starting Your Driver Intervention Program

Where You Stand At This Point

You've had your license taken away and have gone to court.  You have two suspensions at this point.  Let's say that it's a 1st Offense DWI, or RSA 265-A:18, in which case they are:
  • the administrative (Department of Safety, Division of Motor Vehicles) suspension is 6 months; and,
  • the criminal court suspension is 9 months.
The will run concurrently, unless you refused a BAC test, in which case they run consecutively.

Driver Intervention Programs

The criminal court suspension will require that you enter and successfully complete a relevant driver intervention program before you get your license back.  If you enroll within 45 days they'll reduce your criminal court suspension significantly, usually 3 months.  For a 1st Offense DWI, you need to enroll in either the Weekend Impaired Driver Intervention Program (WIDIP) or the Impaired Driver Intervention Program (IDIP).  Each consists of 20 hours of instruction.  The WIDIP is a residential program lasting from Friday night to Sunday afternoon, and costs $585.  The IDIP is a 22 hour course that meets twice a week for 3 hours a night, for 3 weeks, and costs $460.  If this is your second DUI, you will either take the Phase II (if they were spaced a long time apart) or the MOP courses.

You have to take your course at the facility closest to your residence or place of work.  For me, this meant Amethyst Foundation, Inc. or REAP.  I chose Amethyst.  Most of you will also likely go to Amethyst Foundation or REAP.

This is from the Department of Safety, Division of Motor Vehicles Website:
Alcohol Intervention/Education Programs

THERE ARE FOUR TYPES OF PROGRAMS:
  • Impaired Driver Intervention Program (IDIP) or Weekend Impaired Driver Intervention Programs (WIDIP)
  • Phase II Programs for the Repeat First Offender
  • The Multiple Offender Program (MOP) for Second or Subsequent Offenders
  • 28 Day Residential Treatment Programs
PROVIDING AGENCIES:
  • Community Alcohol Information Program (CAIP) (Provides: IDIP, WIDIP, and Phase II)
    119 North Main Street
    Boscawen, NH 03303
    PO Box 8507
    Penacook NH 03303-8507
    Phone: 603-753-8181 or 1-800-660-4246
    Fax: 603-753-4422
     
  • Court Referral Program (Provides: IDIP)
    103 Roxbury Street, Suite 206
    Keene NH 03247
    Phone: 603-352-0800
    Fax: 603-352-1699
  • Friendship House (Provides: 28 Day Residential)
    Route 302
    Bethlehem, NH 03574
    Phone: 603-869-2210
     
  • Serenity Place (REAP) (Provides: IDIP, Phase II, and MOP)
    93 Manchester Street
    Manchester NH 03101
    PO Box 1477
    Manchester NH 03105
    Phone: 603-625-4528
    Fax: 603-625-6982
     
  • Southeastern NH Alcohol & Drug Abuse Services (Provides: IDIP and MOP)
    272 County Farm Road
    Dover NH 03820
    Phone: 603-516-8160
    Fax: 603-749-3983
  • The Farnum Center (Provides: 28 Day Residential)
    235 Hanover Street
    Manchester NH 03104
    Phone: 603-622-3020 exts 10 or 33
  • Tri-County Community Action Program (Provides: IDIP, WIDIP, Phase II, and MOP)
    PO Box 659
    Berlin NH 03570
    Phone: 603-752-7941
    Fax: 603-752-7832
The New Hampshire Code of Administrative Rules (He-A 700), and the New Hampshire Statutes (RSA 265-A:39 and RSA 265-A:42) describe everything about these programs.  Print these out and read them so that you understand everything relevant to the program you are enrolling in!

Once you enroll, be sure that a copy of your enrollment documents are mailed to the New Hampshire Circuit Court where you were convicted, so that they will reduce your sentence.

What "Successful Completion" Means

You must "successfully complete" your intervention program.  So just attend class and be on your best behavior, right?  No.

He-A 702 contains the definitions used in He-A Chapter 700.  The definitions are always at the beginning of each chapter and they often mean something different than a normal person would think.
He-A 702 (ao) "Successful completion" means "successful completion" as defined in RSA 265-A:42, II and III and RSA 265-A18, VII(c)."
RSA 265-A18, VII(c) states:
"Successful completion'' means meeting further counseling requirements, if any, arising out of the final evaluation given to the offender at the I.D.I.P. or the M.O.P. or its equivalent; provided, however, that the offender shall have the right to a hearing before the commissioner or designee, who shall determine whether the further counseling requirements arising out of the final evaluation are warranted and appropriate, and whether the offender should be eligible for license restoration.  The definition in this subparagraph shall also apply to RSA 265-A:42.
 RSA 265-A:42, II:
For the purposes of this section, "successful completion'' means meeting further counseling requirements, if any, arising out of the final evaluation given to the offender at the I.D.I.P. or the M.O.P. or its equivalent; provided, however, that the offender shall have the right to a hearing before the commissioner or designee, who shall determine whether the further counseling requirements arising out of the final evaluation are warranted and appropriate, and whether the offender should be eligible for license restoration.
Administrative rule He-A 704.05  "Attendance and Completion Requirements," states:
(a)  Pursuant to RSA 265-A:42, V(a), a client shall be presumed to have successfully completed an IDIP or WIDIP if he or she has met the following requirements:
   (1)  Attendance at all class sessions, with active participation in discussions and assessments,  and completion of exercises, tests, and all required forms;
   (2)  Completion of the scheduled exit evaluation and assessment interview; and
   (3)  Payment in full of all assessed program and administrative fees.
(b)  The presumption in (a) shall be overcome by the provider if the LADC     conducting the exit evaluation and assessment interview issues a positive finding for alcohol or other drug abuse and/or dependence and requires the client to comply with further counseling requirements before the program is considered to have been successfully completed. 
 Isn't that sneaky?  After the classes, you are not done if the LADC conducting the exit evaluation and assessment interview issues a positive finding for alcohol or other drug abuse and/or dependence.  In that case they can ask you to do "further counseling requirements" or "aftercare."  Aftercare may be significant and require more than a year to finish, until which you will not get your license back.

What Constitutes A "Positive Finding" Which Will Trigger Aftercare?

The guidelines for what constitutes a positive finding are in He-A 707.12 (c):
He-A 707.12  Exit Evaluation and Assessment Interview.

          (c)  The LADC conducting the exit evaluation and assessment interview shall issue a positive finding, thus overcoming the presumption of successful completion described in He-A 704.05(a), if any of the following exists:

(1)  The client’s diagnostic test scores indicate alcohol or drug abuse or dependence, as follows:
a.  The client’s DRI-II alcohol or drug scale score is at the 60th percentile or greater;
b.  The client’s DRI-II truthfulness scale score is at the 90th percentile or greater; or
c.  The client’s RIASI score is 10 or greater;
(2)  The client is age 21 or over and had a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.16 or higher at the time of arrest;
(3)  The client has 2 or more alcohol or drug-related motor vehicle arrests or convictions;
(4)  The client is under the age of 21 and had a BAC of 0.08 or higher at the time of arrest; or
(5)  The client meets diagnostic criteria for alcohol or other substance abuse and/or dependence in accordance with the most recent version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorder (currently the DSM-IV).
If you scored positive for any of the 5 items above (there are really 8), you will get assigned aftercare.  You will have to see a LADC counselor, attend AA meetings, and abstain completely from alcohol or any mood-altering substance.  Aftercare may last over a year.

Several points:
  • The people at Amethyst Foundation were absolutely incompetent at every aspect of their job.  (Probably because of long term alcohol use and the pro-belief/anti-intellectual philosophy they espouse as AA'ers.)  Beware!  Keep copies of all your paperwork.  Get everything in writing.
  • The LADCs there are shockingly incompetent and ignorant about science, interpreting diagnostic test scores, the law, etc...  Never, ever, follow their advice.  Pretend that you are impressed with their knowledge--their insecurity feeds off of that.  
  • Never show that you have an independent thought.  Say and do as little as possible, because they will use whatever they can get against you to justify more aftercare.  
  • The amount of aftercare is discretionary.  If the LADC dislikes you, he/she can, once they have a positive finding, dump a ton of aftercare on you.
  • The LADCs there think that they are on a mission to punish you for the betterment of society.  They are on a huge ego trip.  Don't fight it--it will only make it worse on you.
  •  The recovery industry feeds off of itself.  Expect the LADC to order as part of your aftercare counseling with another LADC.  Insurance will not cover this (unless they are also Licensed Mental Health Counselors, which 99.9% are not because they only have high school/GED educations).
Items (2), (3), and (4) are straightforward.  If you are under 21, you are screwed--aftercare is mandatory if your BAC was at or above .08.  This explains all the teenagers I see in AA.  Mothers Against Drunk Driving is going after "underage" drinking very, very hard.  MADD actively opposes any consumption of alcohol by anyone under the age of 21, even when not associated in any way with driving.  Item (3) is arguably unconstitutional because merely being arrested of an alcohol- or drug-related motor vehicle violation is not an indication of guilt.

Item (5) is meeting the DSM-IV criteria for alcohol or substance abuse or dependence.  You will be assessed for this during the courses.  Without telling you that the questions are related to the DSM-IV criteria, or their impact on your aftercare, the LADC teaching the course will have you answer them.  WATCH OUT!  The LADC I had did not ask the questions exactly as phrased by the DSM-IV and most people ended up being diagnosed incorrectly as alcohol dependent or abusers.  When the LADC hands you out a questionnaire with these questions be very, very careful.
DSM-IV Diagnostic Criteria for Alcohol Dependence
A maladaptive pattern of alcohol use, leading to clinically significant impairment or distress, as manifested by three or more of the following seven criteria, occurring at any time in the same 12-month period:
1.       Tolerance, as defined by either of the following:
a)      A need for markedly increased amounts of alcohol to achieve intoxication or desired effect.
b)      Markedly diminished effect with continued use of the same amount of alcohol.
2.       Withdrawal, as defined by either of the following:
a)      The characteristic withdrawal syndrome for alcohol (refer to DSM-IV for further details).
b)      Alcohol is taken to relieve or avoid withdrawal symptoms.
3.       Alcohol is often taken in larger amounts or over a longer period than was intended.
4.       There is a persistent desire or there are unsuccessful efforts to cut down or control alcohol use.
5.       A great deal of time is spent in activities necessary to obtain alcohol, use alcohol or recover from its effects.
6.       Important social, occupational, or recreational activities are given up or reduced because of alcohol use.
7.       Alcohol use is continued despite knowledge of having a persistent or recurrent physical or psychological problem that is likely to have been caused or exacerbated by the alcohol (e.g., continued drinking despite recognition that an ulcer was made worse by alcohol consumption).
DSM-IV Diagnostic Criteria for Alcohol Abuse 
1. A maladaptive pattern of alcohol abuse leading to clinically significant impairment or distress, as manifested by one or more of the following, occurring within a 12-month period:
a)      Recurrent alcohol use resulting in failure to fulfil major role obligations at work, school, or home (e.g., repeated absences or poor work performance related to substance use; substance-related absences, suspensions or expulsions from school; or neglect of children or household).
b)      Recurrent alcohol use in situations in which it is physically hazardous (e.g., driving an automobile or operating a machine).
c)      Recurrent alcohol-related legal problems (e.g., arrests for alcohol-related disorderly conduct).
d)      Continued alcohol use despite persistent or recurrent social or interpersonal problems caused or exacerbated by the effects of the alcohol (e.g., arguments with spouse about consequences of intoxication or physical fights).
2. These symptoms must never have met the criteria for alcohol dependence.

References:  DSM-IV. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC.
Item (1) contains three criteria, meeting any one will require aftercare.  Two are DRI-II scores.  The third is your RIASI score.  These two diagnostic tests will be administered to you during you one hour intake interview with the agency providing your W/IDIP.

 The DRI-II AND RIASI Diagnostic Tests

If you score high on these two diagnostic tests, you will be assigned aftercare.  What are these?

First, the DRI-II.  According to the company that designs and sells it, Behavior Data Systems, Ltd.:
The Driver Risk Inventory-II, or DRI-II, was designed specifically for DUI/DWI offender assessment. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) reviewed all major DUI/DWI offender tests and rated the DRI-II as the best. NHTSA is the highest federal authority in the DUI field. The DRI-II assesses offender truthfulness, quantifies alcohol and drug abuse severity, classifies substance abuse/dependency according to DSM-IV criteria, measures stress handling abilities and determines driver risk. The DRI-II has impressive reliability, validity and accuracy.

Description

The Driver Risk Inventory-II, or DRI-II, is a brief, easily administered and automated (computer-scored and interpreted) DUI/DWI offender screening instrument or test. The DRI-II contains six scales that measure client truthfulness, driver risk, stress coping abilities, alcohol abuse severity and drug abuse severity while concurrently classifying offenders as substance abusers or substance dependent in accordance with DSM-IV criteria.


Six Driver Risk Inventory-II Scales


The DRI-II contains 6 separate scales (or measures) that are standardized on the DUI/DWI offender population. These include:


Truthfulness Scale: Measures how truthful the offender was while completing the DRI-II. It detects denial and identifies attempts to try and fake good.

Alcohol Scale: Measures alcohol (beer, wine and other liquor) use and abuse. This scale measures the severity of alcohol abuse while identifying alcohol-related problems.

Drugs Scale: Measures the severity of illicit drug (marijuana, crack, cocaine, amphetamines, barbiturates and heroin) use and abuse while identifying drug-related problems.    

Substance Abuse/Dependency Scale: Utilizes DSM-IV criteria to classify substance abuse or substance dependency. Substance (alcohol and other drugs) users are classified with DSM-IV criteria.    
Driver Risk Scale: Measures driver risk independent of substance (alcohol or other drugs) use or abuse. Some people are simply dangerous drivers.  

Stress Coping Abilities Scale: Measures one's ability to cope effectively with stress. Stress exacerbates symptoms of emotional and mental health problems.

The DRI-II assesses attitudes and behaviors, yielding a DUI/DWI offender profile. Paper-pencil or on-screen test administration takes 25 minutes to complete, and tests are computer-scored with reports printed on-site within 2 ½ minutes.

The DRI-II was developed specifically for DUI/DWI offender evaluation. It is much more than just another alcohol or drug test; consequently, the DRI-II measures important behaviors missed by other tests.

Driver Risk Inventory-II Test Booklet

DRI-II test booklets are provided free. These booklets contain 140 items (84 true/false, 56 multiple choice). This booklet is written at a high 5th grade to a low 6th grade level. If a person can read the newspaper, they can read the DRI-II. It takes 25 minutes, on average, for DUI/DWI offenders to complete the test. DRI-II test booklets are available in both English and Spanish.

                 "Over one million DUI/DWI offenders in the DRI Database"

Driver Risk Inventory-II Reports


In brief, DRI-II reports summarize the DUI/DWI offender's self-reported court history, explain what attained scores mean and offer specific score-related recommendations.


Within 2½ minutes from test data entry, automated (computer-generated) 3-page reports are printed on-site. These reports summarize a lot of information in an easily understood format. For example, these reports include a DRI-II profile (graph), which summarizes DUI/DWI offender findings at a glance. Also included are attained scale scores, an explanation of what each score means and specific score-related recommendations.


Significant items (direct admissions) are highlighted, and answers to the built-in interview (the last sequence of multiple choice items) are presented. Emphasis has been placed on having meaningful reports that are helpful and easily understood.


To go directly to the example DRI-II report, click on the DRI-II Report link.
Wow!  That sounds like a great test, doesn't it?  The problem is that there is almost zero peer-review of the DRI-II test.  There have been only two studies of the DRI-II by independent researchers and those were seriously flawed.  All the other studies were done by Behavior Data Systems, Ltd.  In fact, Behavior Data Systems collects all DRI-II data and refuses to share it.  The passage above is just a sales pitch.

The AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety reviewed the DRI-II test in the exhaustive, rigorous study, "Review of screening instruments and procedures for evaluating driving while intoxicated/impaired (DWI) offenders."  (Chang, et al., 2002).  The authors state that the DRI-II "has not been sufficiently validated," and do not recommend using it for that reason.

Next, the RIASI test.  This is short for "Research Institute on Addiction Self Inventory."  It's a 52 question, paper and pencil, 15 minute test developed in 1997 which supposedly predicts the likelihood of recidivism.

The Baldwin Research Institute, while conducting a study of the NY State Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services (OASAS), had this to say about the RIASI test:
Individuals who are charged with a DWI are also required to have medical evaluations. After placement in a Drunk Driving Program an assessment tool (RIASI) is used to evaluate the seriousness of the client’s problem. The problem with this evaluation tool is that it is an inaccurate measure of a substance abuse problem. After contacting Tom Nochajski from the University of Buffalo, one of the creators of the RIASI test, my office obtained a copy of the test and the accompanying research information backing up its efficacy and information pertaining to how it’s administered. After handing out the RIASI to 9 employees of Baldwin Research Institute, Inc. and tallying the results not a single person passed. What makes this result completely erroneous is that, to date, not a single person who took the test uses drugs or drinks and not a single person passed the test. Failing the tests is an indication that substance abuse treatment is necessary.
The RIASI is not very specific.  Most people score as substance abusers.

How To Not Flunk The Assessments

How to interact with the LADCs

(Note:  most of this material is from the excellent site, DUI School Truth, by "1lastdui." It's an excellent site and I have posted it on my blogroll.)

The LADC should be a trained interviewer that looks for clues that you are being untruthful or a Substance Abuser during your “Alcohol Assessment” or “Substance Abuse” interview. This causes problems because you may be telling the truth but you are acting like you are not. The best way to avoid this is to know what they look for from people who are being untruthful. You must be prepared for the interview so that they do not determine you untruthful and in need of intensive rehab. Below is a list of the things they look for to determine if you need intensive rehab.

1. Being on time. They note if you are on time or not. If you are late they take this as meaning that your life is unmanageable and you are having trouble coping. To the councilor this is a sign that you are an alcoholic or substance abuser in need of intensive rehab.


2. Appearance. They note this in the paperwork they send to the Court, Probation and the DMV . You should be clean shaven and in your best clothes and shoes and refreshed. If you are not, you may be having trouble coping with Substance Abuse and and in need of intensive rehab.


3. Eye contact. If you look away from them often this is a sign that you are being untruthful and need to have a “time out” to think up an untruthful answer. If you to roll your eyes or look up to the right or left may be lying.


4. Posture. When you sit in the chair if you fidget in the chair, slouch or cross your arms or legs, this is a sign that you are trying to protect yourself and may be being untruthful.


5. Hand gestures. If you touch your mouth or face during the interview it is taken as a defensive measure to protect yourself and you are being untruthful.


6. Detailed answers. If you give long elaborate answers it will be taken that you have thought the answers out before hand and are prepared to be untruthful.


7. Tell tale answers. The councilor will believe that you are untruthful if you use any of the following statements:
I know it sounds bad but …
It is hard to believe but …
Not really …


8. Being nervous and talking to fast or slow. Nervousness always means that you are hiding something and afraid the councilor is going to find out. If you talk to fast it could mean that you have been practicing the answers. If you talk to slow it may be because that you need extra time to come up with a good untruthful answer.


9. How you act after you think the interview is over. The interview is not over until you actually leave the room and on your way home. The councilor is looking for you to sigh and stretch out in your chair. This is a sign that you have let your guard down and that you were hiding something they did not find.  They will ask you if you have any questions and then follow it with a long period of silence. They are expecting you to make a mistake at this time and mention a question that you have may been untruthful about.


Look for these subtle questions on the DRI-II, RIASI, and any other material you encounter:

These questions are designed to see if you have been untruthful on other questions and if you are an alcoholic or abuse drugs. They are asking you about Substance Abuse tendencies and the questions and answers for someone that does not need extended rehab are shown below. They are looking for signs of Substance Abuse that are not outwardly apparent.  Below is a list of questions and the answers that someone who does not need intensive rehab would give (If you answer them differently you may want to seek further treatment):
 
1. Do you smoke? The answer is NO because the majority of all Substance Abusers smoke and it is determined as a sign that you have a problem with Substance Abuse. If you smoke occasionally (About a pack a week) this question may be dismissed in the interview. The councilor will also be noting your teeth and hands for signs of nicotine stains.

2. Have you ever been diagnosed with high blood pressure? The answer is NO. Again the majority of substance abusers have high blood pressure.

3. Do you ever sweat uncontrollably at night? The answer to this is NO. These are called night sweats and substance abusers in need of intensive treatment have this problem.

4. Do you have diarrhea during the month? The answer to this is NO. Many substance abusers have diarrhea because of substance abuse.

5. Have you ever had a sexually transmitted disease or been tested for one? The answer to this is NO. Substance abusers are known to have unprotected sex at times. If you say that you have been tested for a sexually transmitted disease they will think that you have been doing risky sex due to substance abuse. They may require you to have an HIV test and go to HIV avoidance classes.

6. Have you ever been diagnosed as depressed? The answer is NO. Again the majority of alcoholics in need of intensive treatment have been or need to be treated for depression.

7. Was anyone in your family an alcoholic or a substance abuser? The answer to this is NO. Many psychologists believe that substance abuse is inherited and if you have a relative that is a substance abuser you could have gotten it from them.

8. Have you ever taken anti-depressants? The answer to this is NO. This is also a subtle question to see if you answered question 6 truthfully.

9. Do you have trouble sleeping at night? The answer to this is NO. Substance abusers have trouble sleeping at night and often use this as an excuse to abuse substances to excess. They have no way of verifying this unless you tell them.

10. Do you have migraines? The answer is NO. DUI councilors see these as hangovers and a reason for the Substance Abuser to use substances to excess.

11. Do you sometimes speed in your car? The answer is NO. DUI councilors believe that substance abuse lowers your inhibitions and causes you to do risky behavior.

12. Do you get angry or upset easily? The answer is NO. Substance abusers have a tendency of getting angry and upset easily.

13. Is anyone in your family or a close friend a member of Alcoholics Anonymous or Narcotic Anonymous? The answer is NO.

14. Do you have to take more of less alcohol or drugs to get the same effect? The answer is NEITHER. If you are abusing a substance you build up a tolerance to it and it takes more each time you use it. If you have abstained for a while you may have to take less to get the same effect.

15. How many of your friends use alcohol or drugs regularly? This may be asked in various forms. The answer is always less than 25% if for alcohol and at or as close to 0% for drugs. If you socialize with people who drink or do drugs, than you most likely have the same tendencies.

16. Have you and your Spouse been talking about Divorce? The answer is NO. The councilors believe that if you and your Spouse are talking about Divorce, there is a good chance that it is Substance Abuse related.

17. Do you have any chronic illnesses? The answer to this is NO. If you have a chronic illness they will see this as a reason to self medicate yourself.

18. Do you have many close friends? The answer to this is MANY. Councilors believe that when you are a Substance Abuser you will loose all of your friends slowly and will become alone.

19. Do you have any Hobbies? The answer to this is MANY. It is believed that the Substance Abuser looses all interest in hobbies and just wants to abuse Substances.

20. Have you ever taken these types of Assessment Tests before or ever studied about them? The answer to this is NO. If you have taken these tests before it means that you have been at least assessed for substance abuse problem in the past and are most likely re-offending. If you have studied about these tests, there is a good chance that you are going to be untruthful with your answers.

Other Signs of Substance Abuse the LADCs Will Look For:

When you are talking to the LADCs they are making mental notes about the signs of Substance Abuse tendencies that you are giving them. If you admit to or act like some of these signs, you may be a problem Substance Abuser in need of extended or enhanced treatment and monitoring.  They only find out about these traits by asking and observing you, and most of the time have no way to verify any of the signs they report . Below is an fairly exhaustive list of the traits they look for:
 
1. Arrives at meetings or appointments under the influence.
2. Talks about getting drunk or high during class. Knows the lingo of people typical of having a drinking or drug problem.
3. Frequently goes off the wagon after attempts to stop.
4. Behaves in a impulsive or inappropriate manner.
5. Is seen as angry or defiant.
6. Over reacts to ordinary circumstances involving criticism or advice.
7. Is secretive about what they do.
8. Takes risks and acts in a reckless manner.
9. Breaks or bends rules and believes they are above the law.
10. Has financial problems.
11. Has increasing legal problems.
12. Makes inappropriate or unreasonable choices.
13. Has difficulty retaining eye contact.
14. Experiences sleep disturbances.
15. Has deteriorating personal hygiene.
16. Has chronic illnesses requiring doctor or hospital visits.
17. Has wide mood swings.
18. Has difficulty with schedules.
19. Makes many complaints or grievances.
20. Uses excessive sick time.
21. Is frequently tardy.
22. Hostile, disrespectful, untruthful, and uncooperative.
23. Withdrawn, depressed, tired, careless, or manipulative.
24. Having financial, work, school and/or family struggles because of drinking.
25. Has relatives who are heavy drinkers, alcoholics, AA or NA members or do illegal drugs regularly.
26. Has friends who are heavy drinkers, alcoholics, AA or NA members or that do illegal drugs regularly.
27. Frequents bars and night clubs or places where excessive alcohol or drugs are used.
28. Has lost all interest in hobbies.
29. Has ever been diagnosed as depressed, bipolar, or with any other psychological problem.
30. Has ever been put on anti-depressant, anti-psychotic or mood stabilizer drugs.
31. Has built up a high tolerance and has to take more alcohol or drugs to get the same effect.
32. Has been on the “wagon” for a while and needs very little alcohol or drugs to get the same effect.
33. A large number (above 25%) of their friends drink alcohol regularly.
34. Has friends who do illegal drugs on a regular basis.

Final Advice 
   
Keep a low profile.  Say and do as little as possible.  Be polite.  The DRI-II and RIASI tests, and the LADCs, will ask subtle questions that try to get you to reveal that you are a substance abuser.  Be on the look out for them.  The LADCs are on a mission...to punish you.  They will lie, try to gain your trust, only to hurt you.  Never, ever trust them.  They will dig, and dig, and dig, for any admission from you that they will then use against you.  They are stupid, mean, spiteful, and incredibly judgmental.  They are on a crusade to punish every drinker they encounter.

    Amethyst Foundation, Inc.: Actual Consumer Reviews

    Consumer Reviews of Amethyst Foundation, Inc.

    As a consumer, before I fork out my hard earned cash, I always Google using terms like, ""Company X" consumer reviews."  Invariably, you get dozens of hits with reviews both glowing and critical.  This was NOT the case with Amethyst Foundation, Inc.

    I found a total of three websites and read a total of five reviews.  Thousands of consumers have bought Amethyst Foundation, Inc., products (state-mandated rehab programs).  So, why were there only five on-line reviews?
     
    Here's one from "Rip-off Report," describing how Amethyst House lost his records, charged him $500, and diagnosed him as an alcoholic and drug abuser even though he hadn't used for 15 years.
    "I had a dwi in 1993 when I was young and stupid. I went to the amethyst foundation and took care of it. 1 year ago(may 2008) the state of nh tells me I didn't. So not having my records from 1993 and amethyst shredding reports after 7 years they told me i had to take the classes again.

    At first they said they need $25 to open my records(which they told me they didn't have). I went and got a money order then she tells me it went up to $50..I said in the one day it went up $25 she said yes.lol. Ok so I bit my tongue and did it. Then I paid the $500+ and had to go to classes once a week for many weeks. Then the lady tells me not only am I am alcoholic but a druggy also that i need further treatment. I having drank hard since my young partying days 15 years ago. Let alone ever touching drugs. Hell i haven't even drank a beer in maybe 2 years. I thought i was on candid camera.

    So i call NH and they said there is nothing they can do until the amethyst says I completed the treatment. So i call the bastards and ask them ok how can i get my license back. They tell me I need to see a doctor or whatever it is in 3 separate classes. I know now they just want more money to take more of their classes.

    So thinking i will out smart them I didn't go through them since I live in mass. I sign up with the psychological center. They then decided I need 8 weeks of treatment plus 2 AA classes a week. OK biting my tongue off now I do it giving the psychological center the money instead. Now i am finished after 2 months. They send the Amethyst my records stating I am not an alky or druggy plus all the forms they need.

    I have been going back and forth with these people for 5 months now and still the amethyst will not say yes. They are asking for a 3 page essay from the psych center before they then send me to NH.

    Please can anyone help. My boss is giving me until the end of the week or I will lose my job which consist of the company vehicle. How is this legal??? BTW isn't not having a DWI in 15 years proof enough that I don't drink and drive. IDIOTS

    Pissedoff
    methuen, Massachusetts
    U.S.A."
    Another from Rip-off Report:
    If you have to go to a 'red flag hearing' make sure you ask for detailed information on how their 'test' results were found.  Ask them about their control groups.  Ask them for the actual numbes and sets of statistics that aren't taken from population samples that favor their theories.  The tests are arbitrary and the information isn't based on solid outcomes, im sure its unconstitutional but it makes them feel like they're doing something to protect citizens from harm. 
    Another issue is the service, I find the employees to be unpleasant and unhelpful.  This is an expensive service but the employees act like any other state office because they have job security because they're just another state office...  No wait, they're a non-profit, right?
     Here's another from Rip-off Report:
    Beware of Amethyst Foundation in NH-I paid $585.00 for classes to be taken in one weekend (20 Hrs) so I could reinstate my license in Massachusetts..for a dui that happened in 2004.

    After I completed the weekend I was led to believe that this was the last step.....then they spring on me that I need to go to further counciling and AA meetings for 4 months!!!!!

    Also found out that this organization was owned by a NewHampshire Senator!!, is't this a conflict of interest .......there were 30 people at this weekend class you figure it out $585.00x30. SOMEONES MAKING SOME BUCKS!!.....does anyone have any info on this SCAM? and who is this senator?

    Carol
    Weymouth, Massachusetts
    U.S.A.
     Here's a Google User Review:
    These people are horrible!! If you have a chance to do your classes elsewhere do it ! After you complete your 6 classes they will then tell you that you need after care and it will be another 6 months and more money before you get your license back, they will tell you your a drunk a druggy and that you lie, This all happened to me! I am a first time offender! Its all about money, I can only hope that someday that these people can expirence the "horrible pleasure" of dealing with the amethyst foundation.
    angryinnh 
     Here's one from Merchant's Circle:
    Don't go there--it's rigged to rip you off!!!
    This is the worst place to go to they are all a bunch of miserable recovering drunks and they will make you one on paper too and if you don't lie about how much you have drank in your life or how young you were or if anyone in your family drank you will never get your license back. They trick you into thinking you are going to be assessed after the program but they are doing it while you are there you are better off to go to the classes and not the weekend save your money and get there on time and keep your mouth shut or you will be screwed!!

    June 03, 2010 by anonymous in Concord, NH

    There Was A Blog On Amethyst Foundation!

    Here are all the entries from a blog called Amethyst Foundation NH DWI program:

    Amethyst Foundation-It's all lies (Monday, January 19, 2009)

    This place is a scam you are better off to go to a 16 week program than waste a weekend being told you are an alcoholic and a piece of shit. I can't wait till one of them needs to deal with this!!

    I just got back from a weekend with these people who will try to convince you that if you ever have a drink you are an alcoholic 

    Amethyst foundation- Joke  (Monday, January 19, 2009)

    Just found a mistake on my test results, they have the wrong info when inputted by the expert? Most likely to make their case against me(you some day). I sound bitter but if you ever have to go Thur this you will understand.I will continue to help bring down this bs, self-serving institution.

    on and on it goes  (Thursday, January 29, 2009)

    Have been told by the Foundation I need 12 weeks of after care? this is their way of having someone else sign off on their program.they will tell you it is covered by your insurance company, not true, it's a legal matter.
    There were 16 replies to this last entry and then the blog went silent:

    Anonymous said...
    Wow!! You are going to be even more upset after you complete your aftercare and then they tell you now you get another hoop to jump thru.
    Anonymous said...
    My friend just went through the same thing with them. She is going to take them to court over stealing her money
    KylieStills said...
    I am in the same situation with these people. Only they have me stonewalled because I went for a red flag hearing. Now they are making it impossible to complete the aftercare, thus making it impossible for me to attain my license. I have a friend who works for the paper. I'd like to bring this foundation down. Feel free to contact me.
    Anonymous said...
    I have my Exit interview tomorrow, hoping for no aftercare because i already went through rehab and jail after my conviction... but by the sounds of it i guess im getting a red flag hearing. this whole setup is a bunch of BS. I would love to see this organization brought to its knees.
    Anonymous said...
    I just went to the weekend program and they literally screw you over. I went to my exit interview and was told Amethyst foundation thought i was an alcoholic. Even though im 23 and barely drink. Its almost funny that i would be labeled as an alcoholic and when you try to deny you are one. They will say well first sign of alcholism is denial. This whole foundation is a money making program trying to stop the whole world from drinking because they are the miserable ones as you can see by there mood and manners. So i sent the thing in for my red flag hearing hopefully i get a trial soon because this is bullshit
    Anonymous said...
    can anyone give advice on how to avoid a red flag hearing in the first place what do you need to do to make them happy???
    Anonymous said...
    I think the place is a sham and somehow would love to expose them for what they really are! I have already been 6 mos without my license on a first offense. They totally lie to you and tell you they are there to help you and all they do is get you to incriminate yourself so they can make you look like a severe alcoholic. Whatever you do if you go there dummy up! Don't tell them you drank before 21 and if your parents ever drank don't tell them you will be stuck in aftercare forever and the ladc counselors on their list are in on it and will also keep making you into an alcoholic too.
    Anonymous said...
    Hey KylieStills. Have you done anything about bringing that foundation down. I got 4-6 aftercare sessions and just went to the first one today. Paid a 125 dollars to answer the same fucking questions again and didnt even get a full hour. I would like to help bring these bloodsucking bastards down. ive never been so infuriated in my life!
    Anonymous said...
    I went to that SHITHOLE a few years ago & like everything else with New Hampshire's F----d up system is that they want your $$$! You pay for a lawer,pay your fine, do the time without your license & have to go see one of these idiots that knows nothing about the outside world & thinks that their gonna save it! Well put them in Afganastan & tell them to save them or tell the truth that they are all stupid & playing pass the buck because I don't think that they can even wipe their own asses, it's a good thing that they have Depends for them because they need them!!!
    DOWN WITH R.E.A.P said...
    I Went to there counter part R.E.A.P (Serenity Place) in Manchester NH. they too are blood sucking bastards who extend your loss of license by months. I Plead guilty to DUI because I was told by the DA that I would get my Lic. back in 90 days. Guess what...almost 180 days now and still no license and I have no idea when or If i will get it back for my 1st time offense. Because i failed that BOGUS (RIASI test) which Predicts if your going to do this in the future .....PREDICTS...seriously you blood sucking bastards can predict the future...if so why don't you predict the fucking Lottery numbers...oh wait..you make more $$ off of your clients who are struggling to feed there family then winning the lottery. I was told I have to take all these LADC vists at 140.00 a visit...Thanks REAP...its only my children's frigin grocery shopping bill every week.
    Anonymous said...
    I have been trying to get my license back now for 5 months and was given after care because of these dumb test saying I will so it again...I am at my wits end and not sure how much longer I can go not driving and in turn not working because of it. I was given 6-8 aftercare sessions and have done 3 now...am I an idiot to think I will be all set in 3-5 sessions???
    Anonymous said...
    I went to Amethyst in the fall and was given 6 to 8 sessions of after-care. I ended up going to after-care for 4 months because Amethyst said I was a substance abuser, which requires 4 months of self-reported abstinence before they will consider your treatment complete. So, watch what you say at Amethyst (not that it makes a difference, it seems) and when you get to aftercare, "I stopped drinking right after my DWI (or whatever got you there)" or "I stopped when I went to Amethyst." Whether you did or not!
    Anonymous said...
    So true... watch what you say and claim that you have never drank after the DWI.. and stick to the story
    Why are there so few review of Amethyst Foundation, Inc.?  People must either be too frightened to post, or Amethyst Foundation, Inc., is somehow getting the reviews removed.  Since this blog will be up in perpetuity, on Blogger, or some other server, I'll probably find out.

    As a result of my DUI arrest, I now have a criminal record, no license, astronomical auto insurance rates, and have spent $12,000.  Haven't I suffered enough?  In addition to this, do I have to be psychologically tortured by Amethyst House, aftercare LADCs, AA attendees, and administrative officials who force me to either admit I'm an alcoholic or conclude that I'm in denial?  I feel, as the anonymous posters above feel, that the real punishment is to have all that's left of your will and spirit broken by these spiteful people.  That's not America.  That's more like the re-education camps of the USSR, China, and North Korea.  It is profoundly, profoundly disturbing.

    The more I learn, and the more I try to learn, about Amethyst Foundation, Inc., the more spooked and paranoid I get.  There is a ton of tax exempt profit being made by Amethyst, and they are the entry way to a whole recovery industry that takes on the assigned "aftercare."  Amethyst has lobbyists and receives huge amounts of taxpayer money.  One poster above, claims a former owner of Amethyst Foundation was also a NH Senator.  (I need to investigate this claim.)  There is a shocking absence of criticism on the web.  I'm sure people are submitting it--who's removing it?

    I will follow the advice that Deep Throat gave in "All The President's Men" and will "follow...the money."  The answer will be there.

    Have you had any experiences with:
    • IDIP, WIDIP, Phase II, or MOP Programs;
    • Amethyst Foundation, Serenity Place (REAP), Community Alcohol Information Program (CAIP), Southeastern New Hampshire Drug & Alcohol Abuse Services, or Tri-County Community Action Program;
    • "Aftercare" involving AA and LADCs; or
    • Administrative Hearings (i.e., "red flag" hearings)?
    If so, please write to me!